Effectiveness of Pop-Up Advertisements as Advertising Tools: The Case of the Co-operative University of Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58547/1.v6i1.41Keywords:
Advertising, Pop-up ads, social media, Co-operative UniversityAbstract
Pop-up ads have been associated with negative perceptions of annoyance, irritation and intrusiveness. Ironically, they are sold as being successful online advertising tools, and are claimed to be more effective than static banner advertisements. The current study investigated whether pop-up ads are effective advertising tools by conducting a case study of the Cooperative University of Kenya Students. The study sought to determine the effectiveness of pop-up ads on reach and creation of awareness, to establish the reliability of pop-ups in creation of brand awareness through recall, to determine the brand attitudes created as a result of pop-up ads, and to determine the influence of pop-up ads on purchase intention. The study used a case study research design. The study used stratified sampling technique to select 100 study respondents. The primary data was collected using questionnaires. The study established that pop up ads have little impact on purchase behavior of social media users due to the formed negative image towards them and that the ads are also seen as intrusive and ineffective. Based on the findings, this study recommends that advertisers and managers should therefore pay particular attention to pop-up ads that are user friendly and less obstructive. In order for pop-up ads to be useful for advertisers/marketers their effectiveness must be improved. To achieve this there is the need for pop-up ads to be designed to provide valuable information to online users.
References
Chan, A., Dodd, J. & Stevens, R. (2004). The efficacy of pop-ups and the resulting effect on brands. Retrieved 10th Oct. 2005 from www.bunnyfoot.com/bunnyfoot_popup.p df
Colley, R. H. (1961). Defining advertising goals: For measured advertising results. The Association.
Corvi, E. & Bonera, M. (2010) The effectiveness of advertising: a literature review, 10th Global Conference on Business and Economics, October 15-16, pp. 3-11.
Chatterjee, P. (2008). Are unclicked ads wasted? Enduring effects of banner and pop-up ad exposures on brand memory and attitudes. Journal of electronic Commerce Research, 9(1), 51-61.
Choicestream, (2013). 2013 Choicestream Survey: Consumer opinion on online advertising and audience targeting. Retrieved from www.choicestream.com/ 2013-survey/
Danaher, P. J. and Mullarkey, G. W. (2003). Factors affecting online advertising recall: A study of students. Journal of Advertising Research, 43: 252-267.
Diao, F. & Sundar, S. S. (2004). Orienting Response and Memory for Web Advertisements. Communication Research, 31(5), 537-567.
Dreze, X. and Hussherr, F. X. (2003). Internet advertising: Is anybody watching? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17: 8-23.
Edwards, S., Li, H. & Lee, J. E. (2002). Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. Journal of Advertising, Fall 2002.
Goldsmith, R. E. and Lafferty, B. A. (2002). Consumer response to Web site and their influence on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 12: 318-328.
Gong, W. and Maddox, L. M. (2003). Measuring web advertising effectiveness, Journal of Advertising Research, 43: 34- 49.
Hwang, J., Yoon, Y. and Park, N. (2011). Structural effects of cognitive and affective responses to web advertisements, website and brand attitudes, and purchase intentions: The case of casual-dining restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30, 897-907.
Kimelfeld, Y. M. and Watt, J. H. (2001). The pragmatic value of on-line transactional advertising: a predictor of purchase intention. Journal of Marketing Communications, 7(3), p137-157.
MacKenzie, S. B. & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude Toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretest Context. Journal of Marketing, Apr, 53, 2, 48-65. 18
Methaq, A. A. S. & Nabsiah, A. W. (2013). Endorser credibility effects on Yemeni male consumer’s attitudes towards advertising, brand attitude and purchase intention: The mediating role of attitude toward brand. International Business Research, 5(4), 55-66.
McCoy, S., Galletta, D., Everard, A. and Polak, P. (2004). A Study of the Effects of Online Advertising: A Focus on Pop-Up and In-Line Ads. Proceedings of the Third Annual Workshop on HCI Research in MIS, Washington, D.C., December 10-11, 2004.
Morimoto, M. & Chang, S. (2009). Psychological factors affecting perceptions of unsolicited commercial email. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 31(1), 63-67
Nancy, S. S. & Surendra, N. S. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53-66.
Raney, A. A., Arpan, L. M., Pashupati, K. and Brill, D. A. (2003). At the movies, on the web: an investigation of the effects of entertaining and interactive web content onsite and brand evaluations, Journal of Interactive Marketing 17 (4), 38-53.
Seung-Chul, Y. & Jorge, P. (2011). Do violent video games impair the effectiveness of In-Game advertisement? The impact on gaming environment on brand recall, brand attitude and purchase intention. Cyber psychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(7-8), 439-446.
Wu, S. L. (2003). The relationship between and consumer characteristics and attitude toward online shopping. Journal of Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 21(1), pp. 37-44.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Papers published in AJCDT Journal must be the original work of the author/s that has not been published previously in any manner. Authors retain the copyright of the published papers.
